Kurdistan, Where Credit is Due
By Dr. Mehrdad R. Izady
In correspondence with the prestigious British scientific journal, Nature
(Vol.360,5, Nov. 1992, p.24), Rudolph Michel of the Museum of Applied Science,
Center for Archaeology, Patrick McGovern of University Museum of Archaeology
and Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania and Vlrginia Badler, Department of
Near Eastern Studies, University of Toronto, provide archaeological and
laboratory evidence regarding the world's oldest existing trace of the
production of barley beer. Their investigations took place at the
archaeological site of Godin, six miles (10 kilometers) east of Kangawar in
southern Kurdistan in
The disturbing, but not surprising, element in their report 1S that they
attribute the development of beer making technology to the far off Sumerians,
just as several years earlier winemaking technology was similarly attributed to
the Sumerians. Yet for the past three generations it has been in Kurdistan
where archaeologists have been excavating to find evidence for the invention
and development of the technologies that transformed man-the-hunter into
man-the-farmer and ultimately into man-the-civilized. It is as if the Kurdish
mountains and their inhabitants could not possibly have been the site of technologies
of such significance, despite irrefutable evidence that they themselves
unearthed. Almost instinctively, archaeologists have been reluctant to
attribute origins to the original inhabitants of
The reverse is true in treating cultures of the Kurdish mountains. The irony is
that, as in the case of bear and wine discoveries, the argument supporting
Sumerian involvement is based on evidence that is not only indirect but of
later date (i.e., from seal impressions). Kurdish hard evidence deriving from
actual fermentation vats complete with dried calcium oxalate sediments (beer
residue), is dismissed. Yet Michel et al admit that the carbonized remains of
barley used in preparation of the beer was also found first at Godin, as were
grapes used for wine making. A brief but close examination of
the archaeological evidence and the relationship that existedbetween Kurdish mountain
societies and the Sumerians indicate both the direction of influence and the
reasons behind it.
Godin was by no means the isolated incidence of technological sophistication in
an otherwise culturally and technologically barren region that would justify
the search for an external civilizing influence. In fact, the mound of Godin
(or Gawdin) is located in one of the world's richest archaeological regions
stretching for one hundred miles from Shahabad, one of the capitals of the
ancient Elamites, to
This entire archaeological region straddles the old Silk Road which is predated
by millenia by other important commercial arteries of the ancient world
connecting East to West over the Iranian Plateau, lowland Mesopotamia and the
About 4500 years ago, this region served as the heartland of the native empire
of the Qutils, who were among the Hurrian, Palaeo-Caucasic ancestors of the modern
Kurds before their Arianization by immigrating Indo-European tribes: Medes,
Sagarthians and Scytho-Alans. Qutil military might soon expanded
from their capital of Aratta and the Kurdish mountains to subdue every
neighboring region including Sumeria and Akkadia. In light of the discovery at
Godin of many well constructed buildings, a wealth of artifacts and new
technology, the city is the strongest candidate for the site of ancient Aratta.
The Qutil general, Merkar, declared his independence from the mountain domains
of the Qutil Federation, whose king was his own brother. Having broken away
from Aratta, circa 2500 BC, Merkar succeeded in establishing a separate Qutil
dynasty that ruled independently over Sumerian and Akkadian citystates. Merkar
took the reknowned Uruk (Erech-Kulab) of Gilgamesh for his capital. The Qutils
actually settled and flourished in large numbers in Sumeria, populating, among
others, the twin city of
It is absolutely extraordinary that to this day, tablets have survived that
record the correspondence between the Qutil ruler in Aratta and the rebellious
Merkar (commonlyknown as Enmerkar. after he took up the Sumerian royal title of
En). These now represent some of the most valuable written records of the
history of the Kurdish highlands in ancient times. Fortunately, S. Noah Kramer,
the foremost Sumerialogist, has translated this correspondence establishing
that there was a good deal of commercial and political contact between Aratta
and Uruk. In none of this correspondence is there a hint that the society at
Aratta (Godin?) was less sophisticated or perceived as such by the Uruk of
Sumeria.
Since the Kurdish mountains are the natural habitat of wild barley, wheat and
many other cereals and evidence points to domestication there and not in the
Sumerian marshlands and deserts where domesticated cereals were introduced from
the highlands at a much later date one can logically conclude that the
fermented product of barley for beer making also origined in the same
highlands. Recent archaeological evidence alluded to above only reinforces this logic. In fact, the beer and wine discovered
at Godin date from the precise time period of the Qutil takeover of Sumeria and
could have been introduced by the group which gave rise to Enmerkar in Sumeria.
Indirect Sumerian evidence from seal markings depicting people drinking beer
through straws from a common vat post-dates the Qutil dynasty of that land.
Moreover, the Sumerian tablets also record another introduction into Sumeria by
the Qutil, Enmerkar, the cult of the birdgod Anzu,
still worshipped by the Yezidi Kurds as the bird icon Anzul (or Anzal).
While lacking in justification, hints by the Michel group of Sumerian origin
for Godinbeer technologyprompted theNew York Tmes on 5 November to carry an
article squarely attributing the invention of beer (and grape wine) to the Sumerians
with no mention of the Kurdish mountains in
Mehrdad R. Izady,
Sources
Braidwood, R. et al, "2Seeking the World's First Farmers in Persian
Kurdistan: A Full Scale Investigation of Pre-historic Sites Near
Kirmanshah," Ill. Lon. News (October 22, 1960); Levine, L. D., "The
Excavations at Seh Gabi," Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on
Archaeological Research in Iran (Chicago,1974); Vandiver, P., "Ancient
Glazes," Scientific American 262:4 (April 1990); Schmandt-Besserat, D.,
"An Ancient Token System: the Precursor to Numerals and Writing,"
Archaeology (November-December 1986; Nissen, H., "The Development of
Writing and of Glyptic Art," (Wiesbaden, 1986); Green, M. W., "The
Construction and Implementation of the Cuneiform Writing System," Visible
Language, xv.4 (1981); Kramer, S. Noah, "Ancient Sumer and Iran: Gleanings
from Sumerian Literature,"Bulletin of the Asia Institute, I (1987).